简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A new report by ESMA reveals that national regulators across the EU issued more than 970 sanctions totaling €71 million in 2024. While market abuse and MiFID II violations dominated the fines, the agency highlighted the fragmented enforcement landscape across member states.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its first consolidated enforcement report, revealing that financial regulators across the European Union imposed over 970 sanctions in 2024, amounting to more than €71 million in fines. The penalties were mainly for violations under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II).
The report, which covers enforcement actions from all 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, highlights significant disparities in enforcement approaches. While some national competent authorities (NCAs) favor administrative fines, others rely on warnings or business restrictions.
“The report highlighted the need for greater convergence in sanctioning by NCAs,” ESMA stated, pointing to the lack of consistency in how financial misconduct is punished across the bloc.
Among the national regulators, Cyprus CySEC stood out by conducting over 850 audits, issuing €2.76 million in fines, and withdrawing several licenses. This signals a continued focus on investor protection and regulatory tightening.
In addition to compiling the data, ESMA took direct enforcement action last year, including sanctions against Scope Ratings GmbH for conflicts of interest and the withdrawal of licenses from several data and rating agencies.
The publication comes alongside ESMAs broader strategic objectives. In 2024, ESMA pushed forward reforms such as T+1 settlement cycle work, crypto-asset regulatory frameworks, ESG term usage in fund names, and the launch of the European Single Access Point (ESAP), expected to go live in 2026.
Looking ahead, ESMA will begin supervising ESG rating providers and EU green bond verifiers, further expanding its role as the EUs central market watchdog.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
A Malaysian man who posed as a ‘licensed’ futures trader has been handed a 20-year prison sentence and a RM9 million fine after admitting to running a fraudulent derivatives investment scam.
FBI warns crypto scam victims about fake law firms claiming to recover assets. Stay cautious to avoid further losses and protect your personal data from fraud.
you should always Scam Alert in forex market. If something seems too good to be true, it often hides red flags behind it. Therefore, We reviewed InstaForex and reveal hidden risks associated with it. Whether you are an Indian trader, a potential user, or an existing client, it is crucial to understand the risks associated with InstaForex .
Are FXCL officials calling you to make you a customer by promising a magical profit number? Stop! These officials follow this route to onboard customers and make them deposit at regular intervals. However, when you wish to withdraw, the officials will deny your request. This is nothing but a strong indicator of a scam forex broker. In this article, we will expose the wrongdoings of this Botswana-based broker.